– Jajaran prosesor Athlon terbaru, dan prosesor desktop Ryzen PRO generasi kedua memberikan lompatan generasi untuk komputasi performa sehari-hari[i],[ii], dan beban kerja enterprise, didukung dengan infrastruktur Socket AM4 yang solid –
SANTA CLARA, California, Amerika Serikat. — 6 September, 2018 —AMD (NASDAQ: AMD) hari ini mengumumkan sebuah pembaharuan dari keluarga prosesor dekstop AMD Athlon terintegrasi dengan grafis Radeon Vega yang sudah dioptimalkan bagi pengguna PC sehari-hari yaitu AMD Athlon 200GE, Athlon 220GE, dan Athlon 240GE. Menggabungkan arsitektur core x86“Zen”3 berperforma tinggi dan arsitektur pengolah grafis “Vega”[iii] pada sebuah desain System-on-Chip (SOC) serba guna, prosesor desktop Athlon menawarkan komputasi responsif dan andal untuk berbagai pengalaman, mulai dari kebutuhan sehari-hari seperti menjelajah web, dan streaming video, hingga pekerjaan yang lebih kompleks seperti bermain game PC dengan kualitas resolusi high-definition. Melengkapi kabar ini, AMD juga mengumumkan ketersediaan dari prosesor desktop kelas komersial Athlon PRO 200GE, bersama dengan tiga model prosesor desktop Ryzen PRO generasi kedua untuk sektor komersial, enterprise, dan publik: prosesor Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700, dan Ryzen 5 PRO 2600. Dengan pengenalan produk-produk baru ini, AMD sekarang menawarkan jajaran solusi komputasi kelas profesional mulai dari kelas atas hingga bawah, untuk pengalaman content creation premium hingga multitasking tingkat atas dan produktivitas kantor.
“Kami bangga untuk dapat memperluas portofolio sukses produk konsumer dan komersial berbasis “Zen” core kami hari ini dengan penambahan jajaran prosesor desktop AMD Athlon, AMD Athlon PRO, dan AMD Ryzen PRO generasi kedua. Prosesor desktop Athlon yang baru, sekarang menggunakan arsitektur mutakhir “Zen”3 core dan pengolah grafis “Vega”3, memberikan energi pada merek legendaris AMD Athlon – sebuah merek yang telah dipercaya oleh baik para konsumer dan antusias PC selama hampir dua dekade inovasi ,” kata Saeid Moshkelani, senior vice president and general manager, Client Compute, AMD. “Sebagai tambahan, kami juga terus-menerus menawarkan pengguna PC bisnis dengan tenaga pemrosesan yang lebih tinggi dari sebelumnya dengan peluncuran prosesor desktop Ryzen PRO generasi kedua pada pasar komersial.”
Prosesor AMD Athlon™ 200GE dengan Grafis Radeon™ Vega
Arsitektur “Zen” yang sangat efisien membantu prosesor AMD Athlon 200GE untuk tetap dingin dan sunyi[iv] pada pengalaman komputasi andal, sedangkan core prosesor dan grafis “Zen” memungkinkan performa PC responsif dan pengalaman yang lancar dalam bermain game maupun menonton film HD. Sebagai tambahan, prosesor AMD Athlon 200GE didukung oleh infrastruktur socket AMD AM4 yang sudah tersedia untuk sebuah platform yang memberikan fitur-fitur PC terbaru seperti memori DDR4, penyimpanan NVMe, dukungan tampilan 4K, dukungan USB 3.1 generasi kedua, dan menawarkan jalur peningkatan mudah untuk performa yang jauh lebih tinggi dengan prosesor AMD Ryzen™ processors dan kartu grafis discrete.
Prosesor desktop AMD Athlon 200GE menawarkan:
- Peningkatan hingga 169 persen pada responsivitas komputasi dibandingkan dengan generasi AMD sebelumnya, AMD A6-9500E1
- Peningkatan hingga 67 persen pada performa GPU, dan efisiensi daya hingga 2 kali lipat lebih efisien dari kompetitor4
- Peningkatan hingga 84 persen pada kecepatan bermain game PC high-definition dari para kompetitor[v]
Spesifikasi Prosesor Desktop AMD Athlon™ dengan Grafis Radeon™ Vega Graphics
| MODEL | CPU Cores | Threads | Frekuensi Prosesor | Graphics Compute Units [vi] | TDP (Watts) |
| AMD Athlon™ 200GE | 2 | 4 | 3.2GHz | 3 | 35W |
| AMD Athlon™ 220GE | Detil akan diumumkan pada ketersediaan produk pada kuartal keempat 2018 | ||||
| AMD Athlon™ 240GE | Detil akan diumumkan pada ketersediaan produk pada kuartal keempat 2018 | ||||
Prosesor Desktop AMD Athlon™ PRO dan AMD Ryzen PRO Generasi Kedua
Jajaran prosesor AMD PRO dirancang untuk bisnis; memberikan keandalan, keamanan, dan performa untuk memenuhi tuntutan dari beban kerja komputasi intensif yang berfokus enterprise masa kini. Seluruh prosesor AMD PRO pada seluruh deretan produk memberikan kualitas kelas komersial dan keandalan untuk meningkatkan daya tahan platform dan mendukung pengelolaan berstandar terbuka untuk memampukan pengelolaan fleksibel pada lingkungan klien multi-vendor pada harga yang bersahabat. Sebagai tambahan, teknologi AMD GuardMI memampukan keamanan mutakhir kelas silikon, mulai dari daya menyala hingga daya mati, yang membantu melindungi dari ancaman yang kian hari kian bertambah.
Dibangun pada x86 “Zen”3 core, baik prosesor desktop Athlon PRO 200GE maupun Ryzen PRO generasi kedua memberikan responsivitas mutakhir pada aplikasi kelas enterprise dan alur kerja multi-tasking yang paling menuntut.
- Prosesor Athlon PRO 200GE menawarkan:
- Performa sistem hingga 19% lebih cepat dibandingkan kompetitor[vii]
- Performa grafis hingga 67% lebih cepat dibandingkan kompetitor7
- Prosesor Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X menawarkan:
Prosesor Desktop AMD Athlon PRO dan Jajaran Prosesor Desktop AMD Ryzen PRO Generasi Kedua
| MODEL | Cores | Threads | Clock Speed Max Boost/Base (GHz) | Cache | TDP (Watts) | Graphics Compute Unit |
| AMD Athlon™ PRO 200GE | 2 | 4 | 3.2 | 5MB | 35W | 3 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | 8 | 16 | 4.1/3.6 | 20MB | 105W | N/A |
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 | 8 | 16 | 4.1/3.2 | 20MB | 65W | N/A |
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | 6 | 12 | 3.9/3.4 | 19MB | 65W | N/A |
Ketersediaan
Prosesor AMD Athlon 200GE akan tersedia pada retailer-retailer dan system integrator di seluruh dunia dimulai pada 18 September 2018, dan model prosesor Athlon 220GE dan 240GE diharapkan meluncur pada kuartal empat tahun 2018. Prosesor desktop AMD Athlon PRO 200GE dan Ryzen PRO generasi kedua akan tersedia dengan OEM besar global pada sistem-sistem Dell, HP, dan Lenovo tergantung pada jadwal peluncuran OEM tersebut. Daftar lengkap dari retailer yang berpartisipasi dan informasi peluncuran dapat ditemukan di www.AMD.com.
Sumber-Sumber Pendukung
- Pelajari lebih lanjut tentang Prosesor Desktop AMD Athlon
- Pelajari lebih lanjut tentang Prosesor Desktop AMD Athlon PRO
- Pelajari lebih lanjut tentang Prosesor Desktop AMD Ryzen PRO Generasi Kedua
- Jadilah fan AMD di Facebook
- Follow AMD di Twitter
[i] Testing by AMD performance labs as of 8/23/2018. Performance listed in order of Pentium G4560 (100% baseline) vs. AMD A6-9500E (%diff) vs. AMD Athlon 200GE (%diff).Cinebench R15 nT: 368 (100%) vs. 144 (61% slower) vs. 357 (3% slower)PassMark CPU Test: 5183 (100%) vs. 2974 (43% slower) vs. 5084 (1% slower). PCMark 10 Extended: 2142 (100%) vs. 1919 (10% slower) vs. 2546 (19% faster). Blender (Seconds): 132 (100%) vs. 275 (52% slower) vs. 109 (21% faster). Handbrake (Seconds): 2202 (100%) vs. 5093 (57% slower) vs. 2369 (7% slower). TrueCrypt (GB/s): 2.25 (100%) vs. 1.1 (53% slower) vs. 2.23 (1% slower). Kraken (Seconds): 1315 (100%) vs. 2371 (44% slower) vs. 1349 (2% slower). Adobe Photoshop (Seconds): 91 (100%) vs. 199 (54% slower) vs. 90 (1% faster). AMD Office + Excel + 7Zip Script (Seconds): 148 (100%) vs. 276 (46% slower) vs. 148 (100%). AMD Test System: AMD Athlon 200GE and AMD A6-9500E Processors, MSI B450 Tomahawk (BIOS 1.00), 2x8GB DDR4-2667 (fastest official speed supported by platform), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, GeForce GTX 1050 (driver 398.82), Windows 10 x64 RS4. Intel Test System: Pentium G4560, MSI B250 Gaming M3 (BIOS 3.60), 2x8GB DDR4-2400 (fastest official speed supported by platform), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, GeForce GTX 1050 (driver 398.82), Windows 10 x64 RS4. Performance subject to change with different drivers, firmware, or software.
[ii] Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 8/24/2018 on the following system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. AMD 2nd Gen Ryzen PRO System Config: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X, 2700, Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 ‘Turpan’ reference motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR4-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. AMD 1st Gen Ryzen PRO System Config: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X, 1700, Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 X370 Xpower Gaming Titanium motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR4-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Multiprocessing performance represented by Cinebench R15 nT multiprocessing performance. System performance represented by PCMark10 extended. Each processor achieved the following scores:AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X, 1720, 7607; AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700, 1577, 7472; AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600, 1311, 7758; AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X, 1557, 7290; AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700, 1355, 7123; AMD Ryzen 5 1600, 1153, 7143. The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X achieved a multiprocessing score of 1720 (1720/1557= up to 10% faster than the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 achieved a multiprocessing score of 1577 (1577/1355=up to 16% faster than the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700). The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 achieved a multiprocessing score of 1311 (1311/1153= up to 14% faster than the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600).The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X achieved a system score of 7607 (7607/7290= up to 4% faster than the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 achieved a system score of 7472 (7472/7123=up to 5% faster than the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700). The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 achieved a system score of 7756 (7756/7143= up to 9% faster than the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600).RZP-31
[iii]The information contained herein is for informational purposes only and is subject to change without notice. Timelines, roadmaps, and/or product release dates shown herein are plans only and subject to change. “Zen” and “Vega” are codenames for AMD architectures, and are not product names. GD-122
[iv] Testing by AMD performance labs as of 8/23/2018. Performance listed in order of Pentium G4560 vs. Athlon 200GE (%uplift). 3DMark (2011) Performance (“GPU Performance”): 1221 vs. 2039 (67% faster). Cinebench r15 nT (“CPU Performance”): 368 vs. 357 (3% slower). Efficiency calculated in the following manner: 1) Divide each processor’s 3DMark 2011 and Cinebench R15 nT scores by their respective TDP: 2039/35W=58.26 perf/W for Athlon 200G and 1221.8/54W=22.63 perf/W for Pentium G4560 in 3DMark 2011 / 357/35W=10.2 perf/W for Athlon 200G and 368/54W=6.81 perf/W for Pentium G4560 in Cinebench R15. 2) Calculate relative improvement: 58.26 vs. 22.63 perf/W = 157% (2.57X) better for Athlon 200G in 3DMark and 10.2 vs. 6.81 perf/W = 49.77% (1.4977X) better for Athlon 200G in Cinebench R15. 3) Take 50:50 weighted average of Athlon 200G’s CPU and GPU leadership: (2.57*.5)+(1.4977*.5)=2.033X higher performance per watt for Athlon 200G. AMD Test System: AMD Athlon 200GE Processor, MSI B450 Tomahawk (BIOS 1.00), 2x8GB DDR4-2667 (fastest official speed supported by platform), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, Radeon™ Vega 3 Graphics (driver 18.30.01.01), Windows 10 x64 RS4. Intel Test System: Pentium G4560, MSI B250 Gaming M3 (BIOS 3.60), 2x8GB DDR4-2400 (fastest official speed supported by platform), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, HD Graphics 610 (driver 24.20.100.6194), Windows 10 x64 RS4. Performance subject to change with different drivers, firmware, or software. ATG-01
[v]Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 8/26/2018 on the following system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Performance subject to change with different drivers, firmware, or software. Socket AM4 Test configuration: ASRock A320M-HDV Motherboard, 2x8GB DDR4-2667 (fastest official spec of the platform), AMD Athlon™ 200GE and A10-9700 processors, graphics driver 18.30.01.01-180802a-331834E. Socket 1151 Test Configuration: MSI B250 Gaming M3, Pentium G4560 processor, 2x8GB DDR4-2400 (fastest official spec of the platform), graphics driver 24.20.100.6194. All systems: Samsung 850 PRO 512GB. Windows 10 x64 Pro (RS3). Performance (average fps) listed in order of Pentium G4560 vs. A6-9500 (%diff) vs. Athlon 200GE (%diff). 3DMark (2011) Performance: 1221 vs. 1682 (37% faster) vs. 2039 (67% faster) / DOTA 2 (720p Low): 58 FPS vs. 38 FPS (34% slower) vs. 65 FPS (12% faster) / CS:GO (720p Ultra): 45 FPS vs. 53 FPS (17% faster) vs. 71 FPS (58% faster) / Fortnite (720p Low): 28 FPS vs. 36 FPS (28% faster) vs. 49 FPS (75% faster) / League of Legends (720p Ultra): 67 FPS vs. 91 FPS (35% faster) vs. 111 FPS (66% faster) / Rocket League (720p Medium): 40 FPS vs. 55 FPS (37% faster) vs. 67 FPS (68% faster) / Overwatch (720p Low): 32 FPS vs. 25 FPS (22% slower) vs. 59 FPS (84% faster). ATG-04
[vi]AMD Radeon™ and FirePro™ GPUs based on the Graphics Core Next architecture consist of multiple discrete execution engines known as a Compute Unit (“CU”). Each CU contains 64 shaders (“Stream Processors”) working together. GD-78
[vii]Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 8/24/2018 on the following system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. AMD System Config: AMD Athlon PRO 200GE MSI B450 Tomahawk motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR4-2666, Radeon Vega 3 Graphics, Graphics driver AMD Software version 18.7.1, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 Pro operating system. Intel System Config: Intel Pentium G4560 MSI B250 Gaming M3 motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR4-2400, Intel HD Graphics 610, Graphics driver 24.20.100.6194, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 Pro operating system. Benchmarks used: Cinebench R15 nT (multiprocessing performance), PCMark10 Extended (system performance), 3DMark11 Performance (graphics performance)Each processor achieved the following scores:Athlon PRO 200GE: 357, 2547, 2039; Pentium G4560: 368, 2143, 1222.(357/368=up to 3% slower multiprocessing performance on Athlon PRO 200GE than the Pentium G4560), (2547/2143=up to 19% faster system performance on Athlon PRO 200GE than the Pentium G4560)(2039/1222=up to 67% faster system performance on Athlon PRO 200GE than the Pentium G4560)RZP-35
[viii] Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 8/24/2018 on the following system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. AMD System Config: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X, Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 ‘Turpan’ reference motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR4-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Intel System Config: Intel Core i7-8700, i5-8600 Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming5 motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR4-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Benchmarks used: Cinebench R15 nT (multiprocessing performance), PCMark10 Extended (system performance)Each processor achieved the following scores:Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X: 1720, 7607; Ryzen 5 PRO 2600: 1311, 7758; Core i7-8700: 1393, 8581; i5-8600: 1024, 7733.(1720/1393=up to 24% faster multiprocessing performance on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs the Core i7-8700), (7607/8581=up to 11% slower system performance on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs the Core i7-8700. RZP-32
[ix] Testing performed by AMD Performance Labs as of 8/24/2018. Image editing performance represented with as Adobe Photoshop CC CPU applied filters via AMD Red Button Demo. Video editing performance represented with as Adobe Premiere Pro CC encode via AMD Red Button Demo. 3D Rendering defined as POV-Ray 3.7 Raytracing Benchmark. Handbrake 1.0.7 used to represent Encoding performance. Following Results presented in order of Core i7-8700 vs. Ryzen™ 7 PRO 2700X. Adobe Photoshop CC: 31 vs. 27 seconds (16% faster). Adobe Premiere Pro CC: 53 vs. 45 seconds (17% faster). POV-Ray 3.7: 3005 vs. 3539 (18% greater). Handbrake 1.0.7: 605 vs. 547 seconds (11% faster).System Configuration: AMD System Config: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X, Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 ‘Turpan’ reference motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR4-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Intel System Config: Intel Core i7-8700, i5-8600 Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming5 motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR4-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used.RZP-34